 |
|
from maxart/Max
(79,830)  on April 30, 2004 4:15:10 PM
CDT (3)
It is a good idear and the flowers are very good, but the
overexposed water, and nothing you could do I think, a polarizer
might have removed the reflection from the water (maby)You have
managed a pleasing shallow dof, this is simple on a dslr, but takes
more effort on a digicam, a fine image. ;o)-max-
Reply
Show
ratings |
 |
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from guvenorbay/Güven
(110,521) on April 26, 2004 11:21:52 PM
CDT (7)
Eugenio, stream is overexposed f/2,8 seems less, details are not
clear but flowers are beautiful, great colours.. On the left moss
covered stones with all tunes of green could be more focesed with
more closed f. Regards. Güven.
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from mtpsuper/Maria
Teresa (40,702) on April 26, 2004 4:49:47 PM
CDT (4)
I like this kind of composition and this kind of framing, taking
some brenches against a blurred or contrasting background; and I've
to say that in this case the presence of flowers adds surely a
little of tenderness to the image.
Maybe I would prefer a little
of more warm colours, but I'm afraid that the light wasn't you
ally.
Ciao.
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from babumani/Babu
(26,811) on April 26, 2004 9:07:19 AM
CDT (6)
For me, this would be a challenging composition.
f2.8
is a wider aperture, so shallow DOF and the flowers are not parallel
to the film plane.
Due to so many details in the frame, it is
hard to see what is exactly on focus and the overall image is over
sharpened.
The stream is overexposed, a circular polarizer would
have helped to reduce reflections.
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from memo/Mehmet
(38,244) on April 25, 2004 2:34:17 PM
CDT (7)
hello Eugenio, spring is great for photographers.. nice subject.
i'd prefer this shot with a thinner dof. so the sharpness on the
main subject would be better. overall good photo. Regards
<|MehmeT|>
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from leoverhagen/Leo
(12,362) on April 25, 2004 12:22:20 PM
CDT (8)
Very nice picture Eugenio with marvelous colors. Beautifull
blossom above this stream, very well captured. Nice lightning and
good in focus. Nice soft background.
Well done!1
Greetz......Leo
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from chungho/Ray
(24,827) on April 25, 2004 12:14:32 PM
CDT (7)
Eugenio, this one is not the best from you. The shot is reluctant
an interesting point. Very busy photo and the composition is not
interesting here. Based on this title, you can take one flower is OK
with the stream.
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from greenjade/Green
(31,115) on April 25, 2004 11:34:32 AM
CDT (4)
Hi Eugenio! What a beautiful, almost romantic shot.Nice choice
between dark and light backgound.The image has a soft and nice mood
:-)
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from niggmanfred/Manfred
(56,458) on April 25, 2004 3:54:30 AM
CDT (10)
hello Eugenio, a joy with to walk go, to see and to photograph be
able such beautiful flowers, a simple however nevertheless marvelous
motive, the colors are lovely and soft, best regards, manfred
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from herbjort/Kjell
(32,324) on April 25, 2004 3:43:22 AM
CDT (8)
I think this image would requeire more beautiful light too work.
The bright background water also fails to contribute in a good way
to the compostion.
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
|
|
|
| |
|
from meteordude/Jeremy
(647) on April 24, 2004 6:25:37 PM
CDT (8)
A nice idea! I would prefer it if the water was not as blown out.
THe depth of field seems just right to me.
Reply
Show
ratings |
|
Rate this critique
|
